Acute neurological stroke care in Europe: results of the European Stroke Care Inventory

M Brainin, N Bornstein, G Boysen… - European journal of …, 2000 - Wiley Online Library
M Brainin, N Bornstein, G Boysen, V Demarin
European journal of neurology, 2000Wiley Online Library
Following the 1997 Recommendations of the EFNS Task Force on Acute Neurological
Stroke Care (European Journal of Neurology, 1997: 4: 435–441) a European Inventory was
undertaken to assess the development of acute stroke care in the EFNS member countries
and to give an estimate of the needs based on 1997 data. All 30 members of the EFNS
Stroke Scientist Panel were asked to complete a questionnaire on acute stroke
epidemiology as well as acute stroke care in their country. Data were based either on …
Following the 1997 Recommendations of the EFNS Task Force on Acute Neurological Stroke Care (European Journal of Neurology, 1997: 4:435–441) a European Inventory was undertaken to assess the development of acute stroke care in the EFNS member countries and to give an estimate of the needs based on 1997 data.
All 30 members of the EFNS Stroke Scientist Panel were asked to complete a questionnaire on acute stroke epidemiology as well as acute stroke care in their country. Data were based either on national surveys, hospital statistics, or estimates given on the basis of extrapolation of regional studies, or other defined sources. Specialist estimates were also taken into account where no other data source was available.
Data from 22 countries were received and referred to almost one million strokes occurring per year in a population of over 500 million. Most epidemiological data confirmed an east–west gap known from previous studies. These included rates that, in eastern countries, were higher for incidence, stroke as a leading cause of death, and 30‐day case‐fatality, and rates that were lower for overall hospitalization or availability of CT scanning. East–west differences were not seen for the total number of acute stroke units or the number of acute stroke units set up within neurological hospital departments, nor for most other quality indicators of acute stroke care with the exception of technological standards in some countries.
The higher rates for 30‐day case‐fatality in eastern Europe (mostly above 20%) compared with western Europe (mostly below 20%) are probably caused by a case mix with more severe ischemic strokes and a higher percentage of cerebral haemorrhages admitted for acute care in eastern Europe. This is probably due to the higher prevalence of the most common risk factors for stroke in these countries which tend to result in more severe strokes. This, therefore, underlines the need for stroke prevention programmes especially in eastern Europe. This epidemiological east–west gap is not reflected by most quality indicators for acute stroke care, e.g. total number of acute stroke units available within each country. Most eastern European countries have a well‐developed neurological care system for acute stroke but still have urgent technological and socioeconomical needs. The leading role of clinical neurology in acute stroke care is visible in most but not all European countries.
Wiley Online Library